The defendant's confrontation clause rights were not violated by allowing a child witness to testify by closed-circuit television. The state established that the witness would be unavailable to testify under CCP art. 38.071 because he would suffer undue psychological or physical harm through his involvement in the trial. In addition, the defendant had the opportunity to cross-examine the witness via CCTV. Gaitan v. State, 2-06-399-CR.